Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
| en:metody_dokument:soucasny_a_cilovy_stav_rizeni_ict [2021/07/01 09:52] – revision Tomáš Šedivec | en:metody_dokument:soucasny_a_cilovy_stav_rizeni_ict [2021/11/12 09:27] (current) – Tomáš Šedivec | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
| ==== Key shortcomings ==== | ==== Key shortcomings ==== | ||
| - | Based on the ICT Benchmark (Digital Czech Republic, 2018), international comparisons and own investigations of the MŘICT author team, it appears that the level of ICT in the public administration of the Czech Republic and its support for the development of eGovernment and digital transformation of public administration is far from the level common in other sectors of social life in the Czech Republic. The delay in comparison with the level legitimately expected by the clients of public administration in comparison with, for example, electronification of banking, insurance or telecommunications in the territory of the Czech Republic or with the public administration of developed countries (Nordic EU countries, Korea, USA, New Zealand and others) reaches 10 years or more. | + | Based on the [[en: |
| Rapid progress can be achieved simply by applying best practices from these fields and countries. The causes are known, the main factors for the delay and inefficiency of ICT investments to date are: | Rapid progress can be achieved simply by applying best practices from these fields and countries. The causes are known, the main factors for the delay and inefficiency of ICT investments to date are: | ||